THE DAILY REPORT

Groups Say N.D. 'Religious Liberty' Ballot Measure Could Harm Vulnerable Populations

June 4, 2012 — Some not-for-profit organizations in North Dakota have joined together against a ballot initiative (Measure 3) they say could harm vulnerable populations in the state, including abused women and children, KFYR reports (Roose, KFYR, 5/31).

Measure 3, which will appear on the ballot in the June 12 primary election, states that the government "may not burden a person's or religious organization's religious liberty." It adds, "The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be burdened unless the government proves it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest. A burden includes indirect burdens such as withholding benefits, assessing penalties, or an exclusion from programs or access to facilities" (Women's Health Policy Report, 5/3).

Critics of the measure said it is unclear what will be considered "compelling interest." Renee Stromme of the North Dakota Women's Network said the state "would have to prove its case each and every time someone takes advantage of the law, ... [g]iving those who take advantage of the law the upper hand."

Opponents of the proposal also have raised concern about domestic abuse and whether a pregnant, unmarried woman could be fired because of her employer's religious beliefs about her status.

Tim Hathaway, executive director of Prevent Child Abuse North Dakota, said the proposal would "seriously undercut protection for child[ren] in our state ... [b]y opening the door for people to claim religious freedom, for a justification for maltreatment."

Supporters of the law said the state would always have a compelling interest in child abuse cases. The measure includes "language to protect from that," as does the state's constitution, according to Christopher Dodson of the North Dakota Catholic Conference (KFYR, 5/31).




The information contained in this publication reflects media coverage of women’s health issues and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Search the Archives

Subscribe

RSS

The Editors

Debra Ness, publisher & president, National Partnership

Andrea Friedman, associate editor & director of reproductive health programs, National Partnership

Marya Torrez, associate editor & senior reproductive health policy counsel, National Partnership

Melissa Safford, associate editor & policy advocate for reproductive health, National Partnership

Perry Sacks, assistant editor & health program associate, National Partnership

Cindy Romero, assistant editor & communications assistant, National Partnership

Justyn Ware, editor

Amanda Wolfe, editor-in-chief

Heather Drost, Hanna Jaquith, Marcelle Maginnis, Ashley Marchand and Michelle Stuckey, staff writers

Tucker Ball, director of new media, National Partnership