THE DAILY REPORT

Ala. House Panel Approves Restrictions on Abortion Clinics, Coverage; 'Personhood' Bill Debated

May 4, 2012 — The Alabama House Health Committee on Wednesday approved two bills that would increase regulation of abortion clinics and restrict insurance coverage of abortion, Alabama Live reports (Chandler, Alabama Live, 5/2).

Both bills were thought to be dead for the year after committee Chair Jim McClendon (R) said the panel would not meet again. However, McClendon said he received several requests to consider the bills and agreed to hold a meeting (AP/NECN, 5/2).

One bill would require abortion clinics to meet the same standards as ambulatory health centers. It also would mandate that physicians who provide abortion care have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and take part in before and after care of the patient. In some cases, clinics would have to report the names of minors who seek abortion care and the person suspected to be the father.

Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin (R), who sponsored the bill, claimed that a recently closed abortion clinic had "raunchy" conditions and that more oversight was needed.

Opponents of the bill said it was an attempt to close clinics by enacting excessive regulations. Kim Adams of the National Organization for Women said, "We believe the ultimate aim of this bill is to make abortion services so difficult that the number of health care facilities offering them and the women able to afford them will plummet."

The second bill would prohibit health plans in the state's health insurance exchange from covering abortion care in most circumstances.

Senate Holds Public Meeting on 'Personhood' Bill

In other Alabama news, the state Senate Health Committee held a public hearing on a bill introduced by Sen. Phil Williams (R) that would define personhood as beginning at "the moment of fertilization and implantation in the womb."

Opponents of the bill said it could restrict birth control and in vitro fertilization. Atlee Breland, founder of Parents Against Personhood, said the bill's language is vague and "leaves a huge question for doctors and patients about how a judge might interpret this."

Williams said he believe the implantation language would protect IVF services. Sen. Linda Coleman (D) suggested making the bill a referendum to give voters the final decision (Alabama Live, 5/2).




The information contained in this publication reflects media coverage of women’s health issues and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Search the Archives

Subscribe

RSS

The Editors

Debra Ness, publisher & president, National Partnership

Andrea Friedman, associate editor & director of reproductive health programs, National Partnership

Marya Torrez, associate editor & senior reproductive health policy counsel, National Partnership

Melissa Safford, associate editor & policy advocate for reproductive health, National Partnership

Perry Sacks, assistant editor & health program associate, National Partnership

Cindy Romero, assistant editor & communications assistant, National Partnership

Justyn Ware, editor

Amanda Wolfe, editor-in-chief

Heather Drost, Hanna Jaquith, Marcelle Maginnis, Ashley Marchand and Michelle Stuckey, staff writers

Tucker Ball, director of new media, National Partnership