THE DAILY REPORT

'Fetal Pain' Bills Spur Debate Across States

April 8, 2011 — As at least 16 states have proposed bans on abortion later in pregnancy based on the theory that a fetus can feel pain after 20 weeks gestation, and the debate has "ignited powerful emotions" on both sides of the issue, Reuters reports.

Medical opinion about when a fetus can feel pain differs. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says that there is "no legitimate scientific information that supports the statement that a fetus experiences pain," according to Reuters. The group notes that certain brain and neurological developments, such as neurotransmitted hormones, must be in place to perceive pain. Animal studies have shown that these hormones develop in the third trimester.

Many antiabortion-rights activists point to research by Kanwaljeet Anand -- a professor of pediatrics, anesthesiology, anatomy and neurobiology at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center -- that suggests fetuses can feel pain at different stages of development. Anand said that "the consensus opinion seems to be in favor of the fact that fetuses do perceive pain" because prenatal surgeries routinely are done with anesthetic. According to Anand, pain perception in fetuses is more of a "dimmer switch" -- rather than an on/off switch -- with the perception of pain developing gradually. He said that 20 weeks is "a safe bet" for when fetal pain perception begins.

However, Anand said he is "very uncomfortable" that his research is being used to restrict access to abortion services because "every situation is unique" and fetal pain can be prevented through anesthetic or by clamping the umbilical cord during an abortion.

The bills, which are being promoted by the National Right to Life Committee, stand a good chance of becoming law in several states because of the influx of Republicans in state governments. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 1.5% of all abortions are performed after 21 weeks gestation (Wisniewski, Reuters, 4/6).




The information contained in this publication reflects media coverage of women’s health issues and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Search the Archives

Subscribe

RSS

The Editors

Debra Ness, publisher & president, National Partnership

Andrea Friedman, associate editor & director of reproductive health programs, National Partnership

Marya Torrez, associate editor & senior reproductive health policy counsel, National Partnership

Melissa Safford, associate editor & policy advocate for reproductive health, National Partnership

Perry Sacks, assistant editor & health program associate, National Partnership

Cindy Romero, assistant editor & communications assistant, National Partnership

Justyn Ware, editor

Amanda Wolfe, editor-in-chief

Heather Drost, Hanna Jaquith, Marcelle Maginnis, Ashley Marchand and Michelle Stuckey, staff writers

Tucker Ball, director of new media, National Partnership