TOP HEADLINES

Research Shows Removing Healthy Breast Does Not Improve Breast Cancer Survival, NYT Columnist Writes

March 10, 2010 — Recent studies show that more women with cancer in one breast are opting for removal of both breasts, even though removal of the healthy breast does little to improve survival rates, New York Times columnist Tara Parker-Pope writes. In 2006, roughly 6% of women who underwent surgery for breast cancer chose to remove both the cancerous and healthy breasts, a procedure known as contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, Pope says. According to a University of Minnesota study presented last week at the annual meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, 10% of women in their 40s who underwent breast cancer surgery chose to have both breasts removed. A 2009 study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that among women who had surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ -- one of "the earliest, most curable forms of cancer" -- the rate of double mastectomy increased from 2.1% in 1998 to 5.2% in 2005, Parker-Pope writes.

According to Parker-Pope, although removing two healthy breasts can reduce the risk of breast cancer in women with a genetic predisposition to the disease, "for most women given a diagnosis of breast cancer, cutting off a healthy breast does not improve the odds of survival." For example, a new study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute examining data on 108,000 women who underwent mastectomy -- including 9,000 women who opted to remove both a healthy and a cancerous breast -- found that a survival benefit only occurred in a small group of women who were younger than age 50 and diagnosed with early-stage estrogen-receptor-negative tumors that were unresponsive to treatment with risk-lowering drugs. Isabelle Bedrosian, a surgical oncologist at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and a study researcher, said, "Part of the reason women are frightened is we haven't given them good information," adding, "Part of my hope with this study is to tell most breast cancer patients that it's O.K. not to do this."

Parker-Pope writes that many "women who have opted for the procedure say it's not about the statistics" but about a desire to never relive the stress of undergoing a mammogram or breast biopsy. Some patients also say they have chosen to remove both breasts so their breasts are symmetrical after their operations, she adds (Parker-Pope, "Well," New York Times, 3/8).




The information contained in this publication reflects media coverage of women’s health issues and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Search the Archives

Subscribe

RSS

Hot Topic

Kennedy's Story...and Yours!

The greatest tribute we can pay Senator Kennedy is to redouble our efforts to see his vision for universal health care become reality.

So recommit yourself to one of the most important legislative challenges of our time.

Start by sharing your story!

Do you think we need health insurance reform, or is the status quo okay?

The Editors

Debra Ness, publisher & president, National Partnership

Laura Hessburg, associate editor & senior health policy advisor, National Partnership

Christine Monahan, assistant editor & health program assistant, National Partnership

Freya Riedlin, assistant editor & communications team, National Partnership

Francesca Tarant, assistant editor & communications team, National Partnership

Justyn Ware, editor

Amanda Wolfe, editor-in-chief

Brittany Hackett, senior writer

Cassandra Blohowiak, Audrey Horn, Julia Moss, Santosh Rao, Zach Swiss, Matt Wayt, staff writers

Tucker Ball, director of online marketing, National Partnership