THE DAILY REPORT
NATIONAL POLITICS & POLICY | HHS Reviewing Comments on Provider 'Conscience' Rule, Including EEOC Criticism
[Oct. 1, 2008]

HHS recently announced that it is reviewing the "higher than usual number of comments" made during the 30-day public comment period on a draft regulation that would allow health care providers who receive federal grants to opt out of care they object to based on moral or religious grounds, BNA Health Care Daily reports.

Among the comments received by HHS was a letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission calling on HHS to "revoke" the proposal or "at a minimum" specify that the proposal would not change current jurisprudence on Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which ensures an employee's right to the accommodation of religious practices. "For over 40 years, federal courts have been interpreting Title VII's prohibition on religious discrimination, resulting in a robust body of jurisprudence centered on the balance between employees' rights to religious freedom and employers' business needs, consistent with the mandates of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution," EEOC's letter says, adding that HHS' proposal "could throw this entire body of law into question."

The letter, signed by EEOC commissioners Stuart Ishimaru and Christine Griffin, says that the regulations could violate the Establishment Clause by giving preference to particular religious beliefs, and it could nullify businesses' ability to show an "undue burden" on its needs. "The lack of clarity on the interplay between the regulations and the Title VII religious analysis will result in profound confusion and extensive litigation and will be especially burdensome to small businesses," the letter says (BNA Health Care Daily, 10/1).

If the regulation becomes law, it would cost more than $44 million annually to enforce and would require 584,294 federally funded medical entities and their staff to certify compliance or face disciplinary and/or punitive penalties. The public comment period on the proposal ended Sept. 25 (Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 9/25).





The information contained in this publication reflects media coverage of women’s health issues and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Search the Archives

Subscribe

RSS

Hot Topic

Kennedy's Story...and Yours!

The greatest tribute we can pay Senator Kennedy is to redouble our efforts to see his vision for universal health care become reality.

So recommit yourself to one of the most important legislative challenges of our time.

Start by sharing your story!

Do you think we need health insurance reform, or is the status quo okay?

The Editors

Debra Ness, publisher & president, National Partnership

Laura Hessburg, associate editor & senior health policy advisor, National Partnership

Christine Monahan, assistant editor & health program assistant, National Partnership

Freya Riedlin, assistant editor & communications team, National Partnership

Francesca Tarant, assistant editor & communications team, National Partnership

Justyn Ware, editor

Amanda Wolfe, editor-in-chief

Brittany Hackett, senior writer

Cassandra Blohowiak, Audrey Horn, Julia Moss, Santosh Rao, Zach Swiss, Matt Wayt, staff writers

Tucker Ball, director of online marketing, National Partnership