Doing some policy research? Need some background materials? You've come to the right place.
Note: Documents in the library are organized by issue area — and PDFs require Adobe Reader (free download/upgrade available).
Rising health care costs and the increasing numbers of Americans without health insurance is a major national problem that requires action and attention. However, AHPs are not a solution to the access and affordability problems facing small firms and would, in fact, make the current problem even worse, resulting in higher premiums and less secure coverage for the vast majority of small businesses.
On behalf of the National Partnership for Women & Families to urge you to oppose the Association Health Plan (AHP) legislation scheduled for a vote in the House next week. Although this proposal is being offered to help the uninsured, it fails to deliver on its promise and could actually make the problem worse, especially for women small business owners and their workers.
Wow! What a thrill it is to look out on this sea of pro-choice faces, to know that hundreds of thousands of people have come from all over the country – all over the world – to stand up for women’s lives. It’s been a long time since America’s pro-choice majority has dominated thescene. Too long. But we’re here today to change that. With this march, we begin a new era.
We stand for healthy women and families. We stand for access to basic health care, including birth control, emergency contraception, sex education, STD testing and treatment, prenatal care, and abortion. we stand for medical privacy. We stand for women’s lives. We stand on moral ground.
The National Partnership for Women & Families strongly urges you to oppose any amendments to the FY 2008 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education appropriations bill filed by Senator David Vitter (R-LA) intended to render health clinics that provide abortion care with non-federal dollars, under almost all circumstances, ineligible for funding through the bill.
Before you move on to your next challenge, we request that you make one more decision that upholds the credibility and integrity of the Food and Drug Administration, which you have so ably led. We believe it is important, in your current capacity as FDA Administrator, to make a decision on the Plan B over-the-counter (OTC) application based solely on the scientific evidence and the benefits for women’s health and wellbeing.
We are writing to urge you to oppose any effort to bring S. 2061, the misnamed “Healthy Mothers and Healthy Babies Access to Care Act,” to the Senate floor. By singling out pregnant women and their babies, S. 2061 is the most troubling attempt yet to place limits on the legal rights of individuals who have been harmed by someone else’s negligence or wrongdoing.
The National Partnership for Women & Families strongly supports allowing research using Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT), commonly known as therapeutic cloning. The purpose of this technology is to develop treatments for diseases and give millions of people access to life-saving therapies using their own DNA.
The undersigned organizations are writing to strongly object to the “Provider Conscience” regulation proposed on August 26, 2008 by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The proposed regulation is unnecessary, threatens to significantly undermine patients’ access to critical health care services and information, and could negatively impact scientific research.
The testimony of Alice M. Weiss, the Director of Health Policy at the National Partnership for Women & Families, before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations on “H.R. 660, The Small Business Health Fairness Act.”
The testimony of Judith L. Lichtman, President of the National Partnership for Women & Families, before the U.S. Senate Small Business & Entrepreneurship Committee on “The Small Business Health Care Crisis: Possible Solutions.”
An act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve portability and continuity of health insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration of health insurance, and for other purposes.
People who need specialists to evaluate or treat serious illnesses often do not get the best quality care because of poor coordination with the primary care providers who know them best. Specialists in many cases do not know about other conditions or preferences people have that may affect specialty care.
Congress provided a rare opportunity in the creation of the Meaningful Use (MU) incentive program to transform our health care system and truly improve the quality and efficiency of care for all Americans.
The nation urgently needs Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance reform legislation.
Medicare is a linchpin of financial and health security for millions of older women – including more than 544,000 older women in Indiana – guaranteeing them coverage for affordable, quality health care.
Medicare is a linchpin of financial and health security for millions of older women – including more than 272,000 older women in Mississippi – guaranteeing them coverage for affordable, quality health care.
Medicare is a linchpin of financial and health security for millions of older women – including more than 833,000 older women in North Carolina – guaranteeing them coverage for affordable, quality health care.
Medicare is a linchpin of financial and health security for millions of older women – including more than 750,000 older women in New Jersey – guaranteeing them coverage for affordable, quality health care.
The 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, appeared to ensure that American women would have access to abortion, ruling out any legislative interference in the first trimester of pregnancy and putting limits on abortion restrictions that could be passed during the later stages of pregnancy. The decision followed a long history of women seeking and obtaining abortions – but with a shift in the legal status of the procedure over time.
|Items 201 - 220 of 286||Previous||11||12||13||14||15||Next|